Can time exist without an observer. Time could be defined as events that occur and our perception of some unit of measurement that has passed between those events. Perceived time varies per observer and is based on internal and external events. If I look forward to some event happening, time may be perceived to progress slower coming up to the event and then quicker afterwards. That same event may be something that someone else dreads, so time may be perceived to be quicker coming up to the event and slower afterwards. Which observed movement of time is correct? So, can there be independent, non-observed time.
One image, as the observer, observes dozens of other images around himself and inside himself … there is a central image put together by all the other images, and this central image, the observer, is the censor, the experiencer, the evaluator, the judge who wants to conquer or subjugate the other images or destroy them altogether. But other images are the results of judgments, opinions and conclusions of the observer, and the observer is the result of all the other images—therefore the observer is the observed.
Measuring change of state of particles makes assumptions about how time affects the particles. Consider the zen koan “If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, then does it make a sound”? Without someone to perceive the sound, does the sound exist? OR “If no one is around to see the tree at all, did it fall?” Are we making assumptions about how it got into that state based on our prior experiences or has the tree always existed in that state. We observe and then make up a story that fits our observations.
Water flows on and on
but it never flows away.
The moon waxes and wanes,
and yet in the end it is the same moon.
If we look at things through the eyes of change,
then there’s not a single instant of stillness in all creation.
But if we observe the changelessness of things,
then we, and all beings alike
have no end.
If time only exists when perceived, does it really exist at all? Is everything just a possibility in flux (null) waiting for an observer to flip the switch and lock it into something meaningful to that observer? And if that is true for “physical” matter, what about thought or feeling? Can thought or feeling exist without an observer and if it is being observed who/what is that observer?
The moment you realize you are not present, you **ARE** present. Whenever you are able to observe your mind, you are no longer trapped in it. Another factor has come in, something that is not of the mind: the witnessing presence.
We are not viewing physical matter, we are viewing our perceptions (thoughts/feelings) of physical matter. Obviously thoughts and feelings can be influenced by subtle things that we are not even aware of, but if it is all part of our perception then we should have ultimate control of it. It is awareness that breaks the illusion.
Like you, I am a luminous stardust being that has become self-aware, and we are two pieces of stardust that are having a conversation. But that is just a spacetime event. Our real nature is beyond space and time.
- If a tree falls.. (highdigger.wordpress.com)
- Why Does Time Fly? – It’s up to your brain how long a moment lasts
- ‘MIND’ was present right after the Big Bang (creatia2013.wordpress.com)
- Search for Reality (mindswivot.wordpress.com)
- Attention Couch Potatoes: Time to Move that Thing and Hear Better! (healthyhearing.com)
- How An Algorithm Feels From Inside (lesswrong.com)
- 2nd Grade Science: What to Expect (education.com)
- DL Zeta: Re-Inventing Ourselves with the “Upgraded” Potentials of the New Time (goldenageofgaia.com)
- the way you act is the way you see (part 2) (whoisbert.wordpress.com)